SIGNIFICANT, PROVEN REDUCTION IN WEEKLY URINARY INCONTINENCE (UI) EPISODES AT WEEK 6:

BOTOX® cut leakage episodes by more than half1

Uncomfortable pulling or drawing in the neck

Reduction in Weekly UI Episodes at Week 61,2,*

Reduction in UI Episodes at Week 6 Study1

*Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, 52-week clinical studies in patients with UI associated with OAB due to SCI or MS, who had an inadequate response to or were intolerant of at least 1 anticholinergic medication. Primary end point was the mean change from baseline in weekly UI episodes at week 6.2

Reduction in UI Episodes at Week 6 Study2

*Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline.

Study 1 and 2 design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, 52-week clinical studies in patients with UI associated with OAB due to SCI or MS who had an inadequate response to or were intolerant of at least 1 anticholinergic medication. These patients were randomized to receive either BOTOX® 200 Units (n = 227), BOTOX® 300 Units (n = 223), or placebo (n = 241). Primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in weekly UI episodes at week 6. ANCOVA model with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) imputation was used. No additional benefit of BOTOX® 300 Units over 200 Units was demonstrated.1

Limitation: Daily urinary incontinence frequency was an additional, nonranked analysis of the primary efficacy variable, and not adjusted for multiplicity. Therefore, treatment differences cannot be regarded as statistically significant.2

In an other endpoint, a proportion of patients were seen to achieve at least:

50%, 75%, and Up to 100% Reduction in Weekly Leakage Episodes3

Study 1 and 2 design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, 52-week clinical studies in patients with UI associated with OAB due to SCI or MS who had an inadequate response to or were intolerant of at least 1 anticholinergic medication. These patients were randomized to receive either BOTOX® 200 Units (n = 227), BOTOX® 300 Units (n = 223), or placebo (n = 241). Primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in weekly UI episodes at week 6. ANCOVA model with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) imputation was used. Study 1 mean baseline UI frequency: BOTOX® 200 Units = 32.3/week, 4.7/day, placebo = 28.3/week, 4.0/day. Study 2 mean baseline UI frequency: BOTOX® 200 Units = 32.7/week, 4.6/day, placebo = 36.8/week, 5.3/day.1-3

Limitation: The responder rate analysis was a prespecified, nonranked, other endpoint and not adjusted for multiplicity. Therefore, treatment differences cannot be regarded as statistically significant.

No additional benefit of BOTOX® 300 Units over 200 Units was demonstrated.2

BOTOX® Achieved More Than 2 Times the Improvement in QOL3,4

Secondary endpoint:

Change from baseline in overall I-QOL score vs placebo at week 63,4

BOTOX® Achieved More Than 2 Times the Improvement in QOL

Documented with I-QOL, a validated incontinence-related QOL questionnaire5

Note: UI-Specific QOL Instrument (I-QOL) total score was a ranked secondary endpoint.

I-QOL is a validated incontinence-related questionnaire that measures 3 domains5:

  • Avoidance and limiting behavior (physical impact)
  • Psychosocial impact
  • Social embarrassment (social impact)

I-QOL is a validated, disease-specific, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire scored as 4 variables: total I-QOL summary score and its 3 domains (Avoidance and Limiting Behavior, Psychosocial Impacts, and Social Embarrassment). Each is transformed to a 0-100 scale: Scale score = [(Sum of items minus lowest possible score)/possible raw score range] × 100. Higher scores indicate better HRQOL. Published estimates of minimally important differences in total I-QOL scores in the neurogenic OAB population have included 11 points.5

Daily Leakage Reduction Over 3 Years With BOTOX® in the Open-Label Extension6

UI Episodes/Day

BOTOX® 200-UNIT TREATMENT CYCLE*
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

BASELINE
MEAN CHANGE
PERCENT CHANGE
SWIPE

 

-3.2

-75%

 

-3.3

-77%

4.5

-3.5

-78%

 

-3.5

-79%

 

-3.6

-82%

 

-4.1

-84%

Study design: Open-label, 3-year extension of 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter clinical studies in patients with UI associated with OAB due to SCI or MS who had an inadequate response to or were intolerant of side effects on anticholinergic therapy. Eligible patients had to have completed the double-blind portion, have 12 or more weeks since their last treatment, and at least 1 urge urinary incontinence (UUI) episode within 3 days. Patients were retreated with BOTOX® 200 Units as needed but no sooner than 12 weeks since their last treatment. Primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in daily UI episodes at week 6 after each treatment. Data are presented in discrete subgroups of patients who received 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 treatments.6

Limitation: In open-label extension studies, the study population usually consists of treatment responders. Unblinding patients may cause bias related to overall treatment effects.

NOTE: A total of 240 patients completed the 3-year extension. Patients in whom BOTOX® had a longer duration of effect received fewer treatments over the study period, whereas those with a shorter duration of effect received more treatments during the same study period. Data for patients who received up to 6 sequential BOTOX® treatments are presented herein, as the number of patients who needed 7 or more treatments during the study was not large enough to make meaningful comparisons.6

*Treatment 1, n = 195; 2, n = 175; 3, n = 164; 4, n = 141; 5, n = 99; 6, n = 68.

Next Page