BOTOX® delivers significant, proven reductions in daily leakage episodes1

Mean reductions in daily leakage episodes at week 12 in patients who did not have success with or could not tolerate an anticholinergic

• As early as 2 weeks, significant reductions in daily leakage episodes were observed.1

Study 1 and 2 design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, 24-week clinical studies in OAB patients with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence (UUI), urgency, and frequency who had an inadequate response to or intolerable side effects on anticholinergic therapy. Eligible patients had at least 3 UUl episodes and at least 24 micturitions within 3 days. Patients were randomized to BOTOX® 100 Units (n = 557) or placebo (n = 548). Primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in daily Ul episodes at week 12. ANCOVA model with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) imputation was used. Study 1 mean baseline Ul frequency: BOTOX® 100 Units = 5.5/day, placebo = 5.1/day. Study 2 mean baseline UI frequency: BOTOX® 100 Units = 5.5/day, placebo = 5.7/day.1

IN AN OTHER ENDPOINT, A PROPORTION OF PATIENTS WERE SEEN TO ACHIEVE AT LEAST:

50%, 75%, and up to 100% reduction in daily leakage episodes2

23% to 31% of BOTOX® patients were dry at week 12 in clinical trials2
23% to 31% of BOTOX® patients were dry at week 12 in clinical trials2

Limitation: The responder rate analysis was a prespecified, nonranked, other endpoint and not adjusted for multiplicity. Therefore, treatment differences cannot be regarded as statistically significant.

Study 1 and 2 design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, 24-week clinical studies in OAB patients with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence (UUI), urgency, and frequency who had an inadequate response to or intolerable side effects on anticholinergic therapy. Eligible patients had at least 3 UUl episodes and at least 24 micturitions within 3 days. Patients were randomized to BOTOX® 100 Units (n = 557) or placebo (n = 548). Primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in daily Ul episodes at week 12. ANCOVA model with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) imputation was used. Study 1 mean baseline Ul frequency: BOTOX® 100 Units = 5.5/day, placebo = 5.1/day. Study 2 mean baseline UI frequency: BOTOX® 100 Units = 5.5/day, placebo = 5.7/day.1

OTHER ENDPOINT:

BOTOX® reduced urgency episodes by ≈ 1/3

Reduction in mean daily urinary urgency episodes vs placebo at week 122,*:

Reduction in mean daily urinary urgency episodes vs placebo at week 122,*:

*Percent reductions in daily urgency episodes were calculated using subject-level data at week 12 as part of the planned statistical analysis.

Limitation: In the OAB pivotal trials, urgency episodes was considered an other efficacy endpoint for FDA analysis.

Study 1 and 2 design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, 24-week clinical studies in OAB patients with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence (UUI), urgency, and frequency who had an inadequate response to or intolerable side effects on anticholinergic therapy. Eligible patients had at least 3 UUl episodes and at least 24 micturitions within 3 days. Patients were randomized to BOTOX® 100 Units (n = 557) or placebo (n = 548). Primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in daily Ul episodes at week 12. ANCOVA model with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) imputation was used. Study 1 mean baseline Ul frequency: BOTOX® 100 Units = 5.5/day. placebo = 5.1/day. Study 2 mean baseline UI frequency: BOTOX® 100 Units = 5.5/day, placebo = 5.7/day.1

OTHER ENDPOINT:

Assessed a clinically meaningful difference in I-QOL in BOTOX® clinical studies2-4

At week 12, change from baseline in overall I-QOL score:

At week 12, change from baseline in overall I-QOL score:

I-QOL is a validated incontinence-related questionnaire that measures 3 domains5:

  • Avoiding situations and limiting behaviors
  • Social and psychological impact
  • Social embarrassment

Limitation: I-QOL was a prespecified, nonranked, other endpoint and not adjusted for multiplicity. Therefore, treatment differences cannot be regarded as statistically significant.

Study design: Ul-specific QOL (I-QOL) Instrument total score was a prespecified other endpoint in pivotal studies of BOTOX® in OAB. I-QOL is a validated, disease-specific, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire scored as 4 variables: total I-QOL summary score and its 3 domains (avoidance and limiting behavior, psychosocial impact, and social embarrassment). Each is transformed to a 0-100 scale: Scale score = [(sum of items minus lowest possible score)/possible raw score range] × 100. Higher scores indicate better HRQOL. The I-QOL was completed prior to treatment on treatment day, week 12 posttreatment 1, week 24 (posttreatment 1 exit), qualification for treatment 2 visit, and week 12 posttreatment 2 (study exit). Minimally important difference was a predefined clinically relevant change from baseline, represented by a 10-point increase in I-QOL score.2,6

Daily Leakage Reduction Over 3 Years With BOTOX® in the Open-Label Extension7

In an open-label, 3-year extension trial:

Limitation: In open-label extension studies, the study population usually consists of treatment responders. Unblinding patients may cause bias to overall treatment effects.7

Study design: Open-label, 3-year extension of 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, 24-week, clinical studies in OAB patients with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence (UUI), urgency, and frequency who had an inadequate response to or intolerable side effects on anticholinergic therapy. Eligible patients had to have completed the double-blind portion, have 12 or more weeks since their last treatment, at least 2 UUI episodes within 3 days, and a PVR volume less than 200 mL. Patients were retreated with BOTOX® 100 Units as needed but no sooner than 12 weeks since the last treatment. Co-primary endpoints were the mean change from baseline in daily UI episodes and the proportion of patients reporting a positive response on the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) at week 12. Data are presented in discrete subgroups of patients who received 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 treatments.7

NOTE: A total of 430 patients completed the entire 3-year extension. The median duration of effect of BOTOX® was 7.6 months, and 65.7% of patients had a retreatment time > 6 months. Thus, many of the patients who completed the 3-year extension received < 6 treatments. This is one of the reasons for the smaller n-values at 5 and 6 treatments. Other reasons include discontinuation due to adverse events and lack of efficacy.7

Next Page